<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cuil Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leland.info/2008/07/31/cuil-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leland.info/2008/07/31/cuil-sucks/</link>
	<description>The Personal Blog of Leland Fiegel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://leland.info/2008/07/31/cuil-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leland.info/?p=77#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>think it is great. anything other than google is welcome, and something fresh. it also ranks a plus in colors. the webs black on whit makes everything seem so much like a hospital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think it is great. anything other than google is welcome, and something fresh. it also ranks a plus in colors. the webs black on whit makes everything seem so much like a hospital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Maguire</title>
		<link>http://leland.info/2008/07/31/cuil-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leland.info/?p=77#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Yeah it does kind of suck and it was released with a firefox traffic hoarder too. my impression is that the engine isn&#039;t too bad but it isn&#039;t google. I think the search results are not laid out at all well. and I disagree with their hierarchy of information. The eye naturall goes from top down on the page and on the left hand side. their results on the right hand side will not get as much of a response regardless of what they show. I think that is a mistake and just bad design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it does kind of suck and it was released with a firefox traffic hoarder too. my impression is that the engine isn&#8217;t too bad but it isn&#8217;t google. I think the search results are not laid out at all well. and I disagree with their hierarchy of information. The eye naturall goes from top down on the page and on the left hand side. their results on the right hand side will not get as much of a response regardless of what they show. I think that is a mistake and just bad design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

